The other day, I was examining Howard Gardner's idea on Several Intelligences. I've always been fascinated by it all, but have also been crucial of it. You see, when instructors begin categorizing things and interpreting factors, they often ignore elements, perhaps they never believed of. Whenever someone comes up with something else, they try to then power it into another classification, usually where it doesn't are supposed to be, but if they do it anyway as to preserve experience or not have to re-write their trademark item of analysis.
Now then, I see a new kind of intellect, which I believe cannot just be trapped into Howard Gardner's Several Intelligence Theory. Let me impress you along with Howard if I might.
Now then, perhaps you've observed of all the analysis we've done with Chimpanzees where they are connected to machines and able to think about going something perhaps a prosthesis or something on a display. Well, now we have such factors for people to help them get over damage to the brain or enabling them to management wi-fi techniques to shift a prosthesis where the sensors being do not are available. The capability to do this, depending on how these techniques perform needs a new kind of use of the brain, a new kind of intellect if you will, one which Howard Gardner had not designed and does not fit into his design.
Okay so, someone who research structure, mindset, and neurology might make an effort to position this new kind of intellect into the "Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence" classification, but I am not purchasing it, and that range of thinking does not fulfill Gardner's meaning. Thus, either he must add to meaning and re-write his idea, or add a classification. If he contributes a new classification which I do believe this new kind of thinking processes and intellect should get, then he's confirmed my feedback appropriate above about how instructors so often make an effort to position absolutes into their record of requirements, groups, and explanations. If one efforts to power this new intellect into an old classification, then still they confirm my feedback appropriate because they are pushing ongoing adopting of a straight range and few and kinds of intelligences.
How many more intelligences in the individual natural thoughts able of as we arrive at into transhumanism in the future? And know I don't have a completely described idea to deal with that, although many concepts on the idea, you see I just don't want to drop into the same snare. Further, I see the multiple intelligences design as far too restricted for the long run of humanity and far too little for an natural thoughts body which is so greatly excellent in performance considering its little power needs. Please consider all this and think on it.
Now then, I see a new kind of intellect, which I believe cannot just be trapped into Howard Gardner's Several Intelligence Theory. Let me impress you along with Howard if I might.
Now then, perhaps you've observed of all the analysis we've done with Chimpanzees where they are connected to machines and able to think about going something perhaps a prosthesis or something on a display. Well, now we have such factors for people to help them get over damage to the brain or enabling them to management wi-fi techniques to shift a prosthesis where the sensors being do not are available. The capability to do this, depending on how these techniques perform needs a new kind of use of the brain, a new kind of intellect if you will, one which Howard Gardner had not designed and does not fit into his design.
Okay so, someone who research structure, mindset, and neurology might make an effort to position this new kind of intellect into the "Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence" classification, but I am not purchasing it, and that range of thinking does not fulfill Gardner's meaning. Thus, either he must add to meaning and re-write his idea, or add a classification. If he contributes a new classification which I do believe this new kind of thinking processes and intellect should get, then he's confirmed my feedback appropriate above about how instructors so often make an effort to position absolutes into their record of requirements, groups, and explanations. If one efforts to power this new intellect into an old classification, then still they confirm my feedback appropriate because they are pushing ongoing adopting of a straight range and few and kinds of intelligences.
How many more intelligences in the individual natural thoughts able of as we arrive at into transhumanism in the future? And know I don't have a completely described idea to deal with that, although many concepts on the idea, you see I just don't want to drop into the same snare. Further, I see the multiple intelligences design as far too restricted for the long run of humanity and far too little for an natural thoughts body which is so greatly excellent in performance considering its little power needs. Please consider all this and think on it.
No comments:
Post a Comment